Saturday, 15 August 2009

Electric! magazine article




I received the montly Virgin media magazine called "Electric" and whilst flicking through I came across and interesting article:

We're liking Kids' Adaptations What makes a classic children's move? Simple: A calssic children's book. From JM Barie to JK Rowling, ELECTRIC! Celebrated the great tales behind some of the film world's best plots..... Written by Claire Sargent

The article seems to highlight the importance of the mise en scene due to the epic imaginary worlds- to make the audiences believe the fantasy. There is also the high expectation of the special effects. This article does conclude that the fantasy genre will always be compared to its written verison and therefore acts as a bench mark for the studios to live up to.

Sunday, 26 July 2009

Critical notes on Genre and Hollywood

Over the summer break, I studied a book called ‘Genre and Hollywood’ written by Steve Neale and I found many pages interesting and applied to my fantasy genre approach. Here are my findings from this resource, which I found useful.

Genres in cinemas tend to be focused on mainstream, commercial and Hollywood films. Barry Keith writes ‘Genre movies are those commercial feature films which, through repetition and variation, tell familiar stories with familiar characters in familiar situations’.

Genre theory
During the late 1960s and 1970s, genre began to establish itself within Britain and the U.S whilst studying Film studies. This engaged people to study popular cinema in a serious and positive approach. There are reviewers and critics (like James Agee, Manny Farber and Parker Tyler) who symbolise Hollywood film with sympathy, intelligence and insight. However, many intellectuals, critics and reviewers, who have been best at patronizing Hollywood and its films. As these films are commercially produced and aimed at a mass market, they focus on entertainment and fantasy rather than realism art and serious aesthetic qualities.

The popular culture (which is the mass market) marks a new term ‘generic’ within the film industry. This suggests ‘repetitive patterns, ingredients and formulae’, which ‘perceived by many cultural commentators not as the law of culture, but the law of market’.

‘Genres do not consist solely of films’. They allow audiences to bring expectations and a hypothesis to cinema and allows them to interact with the film whilst watching. This provides audiences ‘means of recognition and understanding. For example, whilst watching Harry Potter, I understand the particular actions that has taken place e.g. the battle with the dementors, the way the characters are dressed e.g. robes and witches hats, the way they look, speak and behave to each other e.g. romance between Harry and Cho and the Harry-Ron-Hermione friendship.
Genre offers anticipation.
New term learnt
“These systems of expectation and hypothesis involve a knowledge of, indeed they partly embody, various regimes of VERISIMILITUDE- various systems and forms of plausibility, motivation and belief. Verisimilitude means ‘probable‘, ‘plausible’ or ‘likely‘.”
Therefore, these establish the rules, norms and law of the fantasy genre. Therefore, the props such as artefacts and texts within these fantasy films tend to be ‘blatantly fictional’ or treated as such within our cultural. E.g Harry Potter contains the Prophecy balls.

I found a quote from Todorov’s work on ’the fantastic’, which I believe can be related to Harry Potter. (Click on left scan)

Fantasy genre can be seen to be suitable for “children or ’mindless’ ’irresponsible’ adults,” which view these films as escapism. These films often address themes of “adulthood and responsibility, childhood and infantile, and credulity, fantasy and belief”.

Also, John Ellis suggests a practise, which applies to my focus films, called the construction of a ’narrative image’. “An idea of the film is widely circulated and promoted.” The press, television and radio plays an important part in the narrative image as does word of mouth. However, we can not forget the industry’s publicity and marketing: distribution, exhibition and studio marketing departments.
“Genre is an important ingredient in any film’s narrative image.” This allows the generic framework for the marketing such as trailers, posters and stills. Also, the reviews offer verbal generic description and indicates the film’s status. The words cause anchorage to the iconography of the film.

Genres
I believe my focus films can be called hybrids as they belong to the fantasy genre but they have features from action/adventure and epic/spectaculars. Therefore, I searched under these categories in the book for any explanations towards the success.

Action/Adventures have many common characteristics in many films such as fights, chases and explosions, but there is also the state-of-the-art special effects, which emphasises stunts and performances.
Willis (1997) and Tasker point out the hero is often literally ’out of place’: “interestingly…the powerful white hero is a figure who operates in the margins, while in many senses continuing to represent dominance.”
Thomas Sobchack suggests the characters are important within this genre as ‘their patterns of action and character relationships display characteristics which clearly link them together and distinguish’. He continues “ a protagonist either has or develops great and special skills and overcomes obstacles in extraordinary situations to successfully achieve desired goal, usually the restitution of order to the world invoked by the narrative. The protagonists confront the human, natural, or supernatural powers that have improperly assumed control over the world and eventually defeat them”

Marchetti explains that plots in adventure allow “variations in tone, the inclusion of different locations and incidentally characters and moments of spectacle, generally involving fights, explosions, or other types of violence’.

Epics and spectacles was used to identify and sell films with ancient world settings and large scale films, which used new technologies, high production values.
Bowser notes the importance of battle scenes, large sets and extensive casts. She believes a big spectacle scenes have a great advantage from a moving camera exploring the depth of an enormous set and the powers of editing, allowing a variety of details to be shown.

It could be argued that the fantasy genre was made for the teenaged audience. The idea of rebellion and deviance acts as hallmarks of the teenaged culture. As Graff points out despite ‘striking legacies, images and myths to the contrary’, there are numerous ‘paths’ to growing up, not just one.
There is two quotes I found quite interesting in this section:
Page 123: “Since 1960, teenpics have been an industry staple, if not the dominant production strategy for theatrical movies”.
Page 123: “In the late 1960s and 1970s ‘youth movies’ drew much more on an image of counter-cultural rebellion than on an image of irresponsible juvenile delinquency.”
Page 124: Hollywood has been decisively ‘juvenalised (Doherty 1988: 235) not only do most Hollywood films aim to cater for a teenage audience, but directors and producers like George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have established a teen-friendly trend towards big-budget action, adventure and fantasy films.

The industry has faced many challenges and changes and this is why “exploitation” has been used. “Exploitation” refers to both the publicity techniques used to maximize a film’s commercial potential and to making of films which drew on topical, controversial or otherwise easily saleable subjects. The idea of magic, mythical creatures and weapons makes my focus films easy to sale fro the exhibitors and exhibitors. Since the studio era, exhibitors have been ‘crying out’ for films to show, preferably films with exploitable potential, and films which would appeal to those still going to the cinema on a regular basis. So, the idea of the fantasy franchise must have been a god-sent miracle to boost cinema admissions and to keep the cinema going alive.

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

Preview DVD Watch

A couple of weeks ago, I came across an exclusive Harry Potter give-away being offered by the Daily Mail. This included: posters, magnets, stickers and preview DVDs.

The first Preview DVD couldn't be used in this research project as it was mainly about the new Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince film.
However, the second Preview DVD had Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (my main focus film) Behind the Magic. Here are some of the notes I made whilst watching the DVD.

Quote from David Yates (Director):
The film is about a team of warriors that forge together to fight the dark evil forces.


This draws upon the main event of an action spectacular as the climax is reached at the end of the film with the Good vs Evil. This seems to be the director's key focus.

Normally when you visit a film studio, there will be 3, 4 or even 5 films in production at the same time. This is what makes the Harry potter studio so unique, it is the only film being made here. This place is vast.


This quote seems to suggest that the Harry Potter franchise is huge and is treated with the greatest amount of respect. The DVD took you around the studios to have a peek at the different departments working on the Harry Potter film.

Quote from David Heyman (Producer)
With Privet Drive: We filmed on the Privet Drive's actual location on the first Harry Potter film, but filming wan't finished. So on the second day of filming, the residents were asking for more money because we were 'Harry Potter'. Therefore, it was cheaper to build our own Privet Drive for the film, enabling us to film as many times as we want.


The Harry Potter sets seem to be the driving force of the fantasy blockbuster and this DVD highlights to me that there is a lot of work, which goes into the mise en scene. This is a specific point, which I could explore later in this research project. As the set description continues:

It is reassuring to see the sets we got to know so well: Dumbledore's office, the Great Hall and the Gryffindor Common room in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. These specific sets never get cleared away. They are always here, even when they are not filming.


In the Room of Requirement, it is the hottest place on Earth due to the mirrors and fireplaces. It took five special effects artists three months to remove the cast's reflections in the mirrors within each the shots.

The Ministry of Magic set is the largest that has ever been built for the Harry Potter films. You could fit 50 double decker buses in here. The set took twenty-two weeks to build and appears in the film for less than ten minutes. In fact, the grand design of the Victorian London Underground was used as inspiration for the Ministry of Magic set.


The question is why the huge sets? Why can't the sets just be simple such as a simple hall or house? Does the audience get some sort of thrill of seeing a huge landscape?

Quote from David Yates:
It's always fun to blow things up. Everyone comes to watch!


This seems to answer my question from the director himself, but I need to explore the element of mise en scene within fantasy films.

Also, the use of technology was talked about as well.

Quote from Tim Burke (Visual Effects Supervisor):
We have pushed technology with the creation of the character Gawp as he is the closest Human CGI form as we hired an actor to make Gawp's facial expressions and the computer made analysis of the muscle use in the actor's face.


The Hall of Prophecy was a complete CGI environment for the actors because the set design could never be physically built so a green screen was used.


Finally, for the hard core geeky Harry Potter fans, the wand duelling was heavily focused upon as a fighting coach and a choreographer made sure the Good vs Evil climax was to a high standard. There were specific movements for the actors to learn whilst using their wands. They had to learn five 'attack' and 'defence' body movements each designated to a certain spell.

Paul Harris (Choreographer):
I wanted the wand duelling to be violent and serious. It was filled with energy and adrenaline for the actors and the audience as well.


Helena Bonham Carter ( plays Bellatrix Lestrange):
Wand duelling is really serious and you have to look like you mean it when you shout your spell.


The whole DVD was an amazing resource to use in this coursework as it took me behind the scenes of my focus film and made me ask questions about the mise en scene within the fantasy genre.


Saturday, 11 July 2009

Empire August 2009 Edition Daniel Radcliffe Interview






I found the latest edition of the Empire magazine containing an interview with Mr Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter). The article was very interesting and proved the relationship between the star and the character. This article was important for some background information.

Liquid Metal pages cont.

Pages about Fandom:

'Liquid Metal' book Sean Redmond

I found this book very interesting even though it was mainly about science fiction films as most points applied to Fantasy Franchise. There also was a clear distinction between sci-fi and fantasy, which was interesting.

Whilst reading the introduction this quote was interesting:
We live in a world where the mass media in general calls upon the science fiction text to sell cinema seats, boost ratings or to connect or engage people from acroos the globe.
A quote, which applied to CGI came from Barry Keith Grant's article 'Sensuous Elaboration' in the book.
Special effects are 'filmic moments of a radically filmic character', for they seek to achieve unreality as realistically as possible- to engage 'our belief, not our suspension of disbelief'. We marvel at special effects images at once for their fantastic content and for the power of their realisation. They announce the powers of cinema while taming the imagination through the very fact of visual represention. This visualisation for the camera pulls the images from speculuation to spectacle' Page 19

Thursday, 9 July 2009

Evidence of material not selected

I looked at a book called 'Action/Spectacle Cinema edited by Jose Arroyo', which I read and did not find it useful towards my research as specific films were highlighted in many articles throughout the book and I couldn't draw parrallel to my focus films. However, I did understand the power of an action spectacular in film and could consider whilst watching the films. I am beginning to have an interest on how my focus films can achieve this? I might research about the CGI and the mise en scene and see whether I can draw upon this as part of my research.
Although, this book was not relevant to my focus films, it did inspire me to think HOW my focus films grab the audience's attention to those who may not be a fan of the film and are critically observing the action.